Which type of study is considered the gold standard for determining the effectiveness of an intervention?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the NASM Certified Sports Nutrition Coach Exam. Study smart with flashcards and detailed multiple-choice questions. Get real exam insights to confidently pass your nutrition coach exam!

Randomized trials are considered the gold standard for determining the effectiveness of an intervention because they are designed to minimize bias and establish causality. In randomized trials, participants are randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group, which helps to ensure that differences in outcomes can be attributed to the intervention itself rather than to other factors. This randomization process balances known and unknown variables, increasing the likelihood that the results are valid and applicable to a broader population.

Additionally, randomized trials often employ blinding, either single-blind (where participants are unaware of which group they are in) or double-blind (where both participants and researchers do not know group assignments). This further reduces bias, as neither party's expectations can influence the outcomes. The rigorous design and control of variables in randomized trials make them the most reliable form of research in clinical settings when assessing the effectiveness of various interventions, thereby establishing a clear cause-and-effect relationship.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy